Common Red Flags When Sourcing Investigational Compounds
Sourcing investigational compounds for laboratory research requires careful due diligence. The quality, documentation, and integrity of a supplier can directly impact experimental validity, reproducibility, and regulatory compliance. Below are common red flags researchers should consider when evaluating vendors of research-use-only materials.
1. Lack of a Certificate of Analysis (COA)
A reputable supplier should provide a batch-specific Certificate of Analysis (COA) that includes:
-
Batch or lot number
-
Purity data
-
Analytical methods used (e.g., HPLC, MS)
-
Date of testing
-
Quality control authorization
Red flag:
-
Generic or template COAs without batch numbers
-
Missing analytical methodology
-
No third-party verification when claimed
Without verifiable documentation, researchers cannot confirm product identity or purity.
2. Absence of Clear Research-Use-Only Labeling
Investigational compounds should be clearly labeled:
-
“For Research Use Only”
-
“Not for Human or Veterinary Use”
Red flag:
-
Language implying therapeutic benefits
-
Dosing instructions for humans
-
Before-and-after claims
-
Testimonials suggesting medical outcomes
Legitimate suppliers maintain strict compliance and avoid medical or health claims.
3. Unrealistically Low Pricing
High-purity investigational compounds require:
-
Specialized synthesis
-
Analytical validation
-
Controlled storage
-
Quality control processes
Red flag:
-
Prices significantly below market norms
-
Large discounts without explanation
-
Bulk pricing that seems inconsistent with production realities
Extremely low prices may indicate compromised quality or misrepresented purity.
4. No Transparency About Testing Methods
Reliable suppliers should clearly state:
-
Testing methodologies (HPLC, LC-MS, NMR, etc.)
-
Purity thresholds
-
Storage conditions
-
Handling guidance
Red flag:
-
No mention of analytical techniques
-
Vague statements like “lab tested” without specifics
-
Inability to answer technical questions
Transparency is essential for reproducibility.
5. No Physical Business Information
Legitimate research suppliers typically provide:
-
Contact email and customer support
-
Business address or operational transparency
-
Clear Terms & Conditions
-
Privacy Policy and compliance documentation
Red flag:
-
Anonymous websites
-
No customer service contact
-
No legal or policy pages
Professional vendors maintain structured compliance documentation.
6. No Batch Traceability
Research integrity depends on traceability.
Red flag:
-
No lot numbers
-
Inconsistent labeling
-
Products that cannot be linked to specific manufacturing runs
Without traceability, experimental replication becomes difficult.
7. Aggressive Marketing Tactics
Investigational compounds should not be marketed like consumer supplements.
Red flag:
-
Social media hype
-
Influencer promotions
-
Claims of dramatic results
-
Medical-style advertising
Professional research suppliers focus on documentation, compliance, and product specifications—not consumer-style marketing.
8. Poor Communication or Technical Support
Researchers may need clarification about:
-
Storage conditions
-
Solubility
-
Handling procedures
-
Stability considerations
Red flag:
-
Slow or non-existent responses
-
Inability to answer technical questions
-
Generic or scripted replies
Reliable suppliers provide informed, professional communication.
Best Practices for Researchers
When sourcing investigational compounds:
-
Review COAs carefully
-
Confirm batch numbers match delivered products
-
Verify compliance language (Research Use Only)
-
Assess website professionalism and documentation
-
Contact the supplier with technical questions before ordering
Taking these steps helps protect research integrity and ensures consistency in experimental outcomes.
Research Use Notice
Investigational compounds are intended strictly for laboratory research purposes. They are not approved for human or veterinary use and should be handled only by qualified professionals in appropriate research environments.

